Monday, April 27, 2009

Murder Mystery!



After all these years of believing that an asteroid killed our lovely dinosaurs 65 million years ago, new findings have shown that it may not be entirely true. In 1978, when scientists discovered a huge, 112 mile wide crater, called the Chicxulub crater, they figured this was the perfect answer to the mass extinction.

When asteroids strike, they typically leave a layer of iridium behind, which is an element not commonly found on earth. While scientists were examining a site near the crater they noticed that above the iridium layer in the sediments, there was a 30 foot deep section that contained some of the same fossils as below the layer. If the dinosaurs were brutally killed by the impact and after effects of the asteroid then there shouldn't be the same fossils.

Geoscientists then analyzed the fossils they found. They examined 52 species that were below the layer and surprisingly found the same 52 above the layer. It wasn't until they examined the top of the 30 foot sample, dated 300,000 years after the impact, that they found species dying off. Some say that land bridges could attribute to this, allowing animals with different diseases to enter new territories and infect others. Also, the geoscientists agree that the scary prehistoric beasts could have perished from haze in the atmosphere, but they say it is more possible that it was from all the active volcanoes at the time.

In the end, something must have happened to kill off all those species, but these scientists are throwing out the asteroid that created the Chicxulub crater as the main cause.


Update:

When the ash cloud settles it leave behind that iridium layer. So finding fossils above that layer throughout shows that some species have survived that asteroid impact. It is possible that the immediate ones were killed and others moved in but from the old theory, it has been said that the impact killed all dinosaurs. These findings show that they dinosaurs as a whole did not go extinct from this one asteroid.

The idea of the volcanoes was that they spewed so much ash at the time that the atmosphere was too thick for the species to survive. So that volcanoes across the world could have helped the extinction and not just one single asteroid.

As for the scientists working on this, they say that they have many doubts of the asteroid killing all the dinosaurs. I don't think we need to necessarily throw out the whole idea, but definitely throw it as as the only cause of extinction. I think everything together caused the species to drop off. The asteroid definitely had to of killed the surrounding species, volcanoes, and other environmental changes pushed them closer to extinction.

-Katie Cyr [B/11]

7 Comments:

At 1:07 AM, April 28, 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said...

wouldn't the main killing power behind the asteroid have been in the ash cloud it created afterword? Isn't it possible that the asteroid instantly killed all the dinos living in the immediate area then new ones moved in during the after math?

-Nick Cline

 
At 11:48 AM, April 28, 2009, Blogger PWH said...

I would agree with Nick.

Have they checked the sediment layer and figured out what it is comprised of? If its mostly 'earthly' material, I would wager that dinos inhabiting the immediate area were killed and replaced by other populations. Given that the ash cloud would eventually fall back to earth at a much quicker rate and cover things up far faster than any normal erosion process, we would expect to see a quicker 'build up' of sediment over the iridium strike layer.
So the dinos died directly because of the asteroid impact and indirectly because of the ashcloud that eventually fell to quickly cover up the dying population that moved in. Maybe...

[Nathan Beck, Group A]

 
At 11:28 PM, April 29, 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This sounds pretty cool, but what do you think volcanoes had to do with anything? I agree with Nick and Nate as well. I feel like there would be more evidence of ash too. How would they tell if it were a disease that killed all of the dinos? This is a really neat find, and I do hope that they find more information on this.
-Alyson Paige

 
At 12:00 AM, April 30, 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This study does not fully convince me on throwing out the asteroid theory. I would need to know about the relationship between the date of the fossils found underneath the crater and those found elsewhere on earth, explaining the mass extinction that occurred. I do agree though, taht possibly the volcanic activity andother changes on earh also may have played a role.

-Julio Rodriguez

 
At 12:26 AM, April 30, 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with the skeptics who have commented. I feel that more analysis on fossils in other parts of the world should be taken into consideration. The asteroid theory was also a theory i grew up with and it's bizarre to think that it is entirely out of the picture. Isn't there a theory of a mass climate change?

- Maura Mulvey

 
At 6:42 PM, April 30, 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm pretty much in agreement with most of the people here. I don't believe one instance of fossils appearing above and below an iridium layer can disprove that in other areas where dinosaur fossils appear below the iridium layer yet are non-existent above. The only REAL thing that makes me question most of this, is that the time that some of these individual species were alive(above the iridium) are thousands of years after the impact.

-Conor Stenerson

 
At 2:00 PM, May 07, 2009, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is crazy! I never would have thought that we would find evidence to contradict the asteroid theory. I hope they do more research. Like everyone above said, I wont let go of the asteroid theory until they have more proof and analisis

-Willow Alves

 

Post a Comment

<< Home